Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 171% (9th of 132)

Based on 247 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x16GB averaged 71.3% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 71.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 60.7GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x16GB is 112%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 79.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 43.4GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 247 samples)
Min Avg Max
45.1 MC Read 71.6 151
39.7 MC Write 59.4 79.6
42.6 MC Mixed 60.7 77.3
183% 63.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
17.9 SC Read 43.4 60.3
41.3 SC Write 57 75.7
26.8 SC Mixed 46.8 62.4
140% 49.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
57.9 Latency 79.6 103
50.3% 79.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 155
MC Write 65
MC Mixed 81.3
287% 100 GB/s
SC Read 50
SC Write 74.4
SC Mixed 58.8
174% 61.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 92
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 69.9
213% 74.5 GB/s
SC Read 48.7
SC Write 75.5
SC Mixed 59.7
175% 61.3 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 67.9
MC Write 71.4
MC Mixed 69
198% 69.4 GB/s
SC Read 57.6
SC Write 68.3
SC Mixed 67.5
184% 64.5 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 99.6
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 62.4
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 43.2
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 44.8
130% 45.6 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4533 MHz
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 63.2
MC Mixed 59.3
176% 61.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 31.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 47.7
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 40.9
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 39
113% 39.7 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
247 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,297,239 RAM Kits tested

Typical Vengeance LPX 4x16GB Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,112

Popular Vengeance LPX 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback