Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 196% (1st of 132)

Based on 975 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB averaged 96.2% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 93.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 65.9GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB is 152%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Unknown F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 52.5GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 975 samples)
Min Avg Max
53.3 MC Read 93.5 208
49.1 MC Write 59.8 71.3
51.3 MC Mixed 65.9 86.7
209% 73.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
33.5 SC Read 52.5 66.7
48.6 SC Write 64.1 80.6
37.2 SC Mixed 54.5 66.1
163% 57 GB/s
Min Avg Max
46.8 Latency 72.3 93.8
55.3% 72.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 250
MC Write 66.9
MC Mixed 89.3
387% 136 GB/s
SC Read 50.3
SC Write 74.1
SC Mixed 59.9
176% 61.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 164
MC Write 70
MC Mixed 91
309% 108 GB/s
SC Read 52.5
SC Write 75.7
SC Mixed 65.8
185% 64.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6200 MHz
MC Read 118
MC Write 70.5
MC Mixed 85
261% 91.2 GB/s
SC Read 57.2
SC Write 77
SC Mixed 71.4
196% 68.5 GB/s
Latency 44.9
89% 44.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 122
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 70.3
237% 82.9 GB/s
SC Read 64
SC Write 67.4
SC Mixed 57.5
180% 63 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 82.3
MC Mixed 74.5
206% 72 GB/s
SC Read 56.9
SC Write 80
SC Mixed 67.5
195% 68.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 54.1
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 49.3
SC Write 57.1
SC Mixed 48.9
148% 51.8 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
975 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,336,462 RAM Kits tested

Typical F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,381

Popular F5-6400J3239G32G 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback