Average Bench: 153% (1st of 115)

Based on 16 user benchmarks.  Model: Avant AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Avant AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB averaged 52.7% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Avant AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 60.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 60.1GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Avant AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB is 41.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Avant AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 16 samples)
Min Avg Max
45.7 MC Read 60.1 67.6
47.4 MC Write 60.7 66.3
45.7 MC Mixed 57.5 63.7
170% 59.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.3 SC Read 19 22.6
38.4 SC Write 48.1 55.2
26 SC Mixed 29.5 33
92.1% 32.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
73.7 Latency 87.4 99.4
45.8% 87.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 65.4
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 62
184% 64.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 53.9
SC Mixed 33
104% 36.3 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 65.5
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 62
184% 64.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 31.4
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 65.5
MC Write 65.1
MC Mixed 61.8
183% 64.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 30.5
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 65.2
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 61.3
182% 63.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 28.2
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 64.3
MC Mixed 60.3
179% 62.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 50.1
SC Mixed 29.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 52.7
152% 53 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 29.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 50.9
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 28.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 46.3
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 45.7
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 27.2
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
16 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,151,325 RAM Kits tested

Typical AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB Builds (Compare 6,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,340

Popular AVW642GU44K0480P00-B 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback