Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 176% (8th of 132)

Based on 72 user benchmarks.  Model: Thermaltake Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Thermaltake Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB averaged 76.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Thermaltake Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 73.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 69GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Thermaltake Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB is 27.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Thermaltake Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 75.7ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.4GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 72 samples)
Min Avg Max
60.7 MC Read 73.1 77.8
57.4 MC Write 69 73.2
55.3 MC Mixed 65.6 69.4
198% 69.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
18.8 SC Read 21.4 25.1
44.6 SC Write 51.3 54.6
27.6 SC Mixed 30.8 34
98.6% 34.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.9 Latency 75.7 89.5
52.8% 75.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 75.6
MC Write 72.2
MC Mixed 68.1
206% 72 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 54.2
SC Mixed 33
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 76.9
MC Write 72.1
MC Mixed 68.7
207% 72.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 29
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 75
MC Write 69.7
MC Mixed 67.3
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 52.2
SC Mixed 31.1
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 74.1
MC Write 67.7
MC Mixed 66.5
198% 69.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 32.4
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 57.4
173% 60.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 28.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 63.5
MC Write 60
MC Mixed 57.3
172% 60.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 27.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4200 MHz
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
72 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,313,192 RAM Kits tested

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,264

Popular Co Ltd RG34D516GX2-5600C36B 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback