Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Corsair

CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2022.

Average Bench: 177% (8th of 132)

Based on 170 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB
Poor: 119%Average: 177% Great: 275%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB averaged 76.7% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 76.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 61.3GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB is 156%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 46.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 170 samples)
Rank 8177%
Min Avg Max
44.5 MC Read 76.1 186
39.8 MC Write 59.5 73.9
42 MC Mixed 61.3 79
188% 65.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
18.9 SC Read 46.9 59.3
42.2 SC Write 59.9 75.1
28.9 SC Mixed 50.2 62.4
150% 52.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
58.8 Latency 78.6 97.5
50.9% 78.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
199% Outstanding
MC Read 81
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 72.2
209% 73 GB/s
SC Read 60.4
SC Write 67.9
SC Mixed 62.4
182% 63.6 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
199% Outstanding
MC Read 79.7
MC Write 80.8
MC Mixed 73.3
223% 77.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 55.2
SC Mixed 38.8
115% 40.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
183% Outstanding
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 67.6
MC Mixed 65
193% 67.4 GB/s
SC Read 48
SC Write 65.3
SC Mixed 56.8
162% 56.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
145% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 47.7
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 62.4
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 49.3
154% 53.9 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 3600 MHz
128% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 45.7
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 50.1
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 43.1
130% 45.7 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
170 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,336,254 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 423%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 534%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

CPU
Ryzen 9 7950X3DAMD  $550Bench 120%, 2,452 samples37x
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD  $467Bench 114%, 2,508 samples35x
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $459Bench 117%, 8,006 samples33x
GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia  $1,802Bench 370%, 37,290 samples63x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $761Bench 240%, 46,082 samples16x
RTX 3090Nvidia  $1,350Bench 210%, 158,856 samples11x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $120Bench 402%, 182,136 samples23x
990 Pro M.2 2TBSamsung  $156Bench 449%, 61,354 samples18x
SKC3000D2048G 2TBKingstonBench 438%, 18,813 samples12x
RAM
CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GBCorsairBench 177%, 170 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,472

Popular CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 24 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback