TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung

M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2016.

Average Bench: 47.2% (101st of 115)

Based on 54 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
Poor: 31%Average: 47.2% Great: 55%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB averaged 52.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 17.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 17GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB is 24.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 12GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 12.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 54 samples)
Rank 10147.2%
Min Avg Max
12 MC Read 17 20.1
5.88 MC Write 17.5 20.9
10.6 MC Mixed 15.5 17.8
47.7% 16.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
4.8 SC Read 12 16.1
4 SC Write 12.7 17.8
4.3 SC Mixed 13.1 17.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
65.5 Latency 88.1 160
45.4% 88.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
40.9% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
39.4% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
26.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
54 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,267,656 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2570p

CPU
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples149x
Core i5-3320MIntel  $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples100x
Core i5-3360MIntel  $594Bench 54%, 5,754 samples65x
GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples453x
GTX 750Nvidia  $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples3x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples1x
SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples17x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples12x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples9x
RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 54 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback