Average Bench: 156% (1st of 115)

Based on 40 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown KF556S40-16 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown KF556S40-16 2x16GB averaged 55.7% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown KF556S40-16 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 64.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 59.6GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown KF556S40-16 2x16GB is 65%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Unknown KF556S40-16 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.7ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 20.8GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 40 samples)
Min Avg Max
39.7 MC Read 64.7 79.3
36 MC Write 59.6 71.7
37.2 MC Mixed 58.8 70.5
174% 61 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12.1 SC Read 20.8 28.5
27.8 SC Write 44.1 52.5
19.8 SC Mixed 28.4 33.9
88.9% 31.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70.2 Latency 87.7 118
45.6% 87.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 78.2
MC Write 70.5
MC Mixed 68.9
207% 72.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 32.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 77.2
MC Write 69.3
MC Mixed 68.7
205% 71.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 30.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 74.9
MC Write 65.1
MC Mixed 66.1
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 30.3
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 73.1
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 62.5
188% 65.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 58.2
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 53.7
160% 56 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 27
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 55.3
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 49.5
146% 51.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 28.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 48.7
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 27.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 44
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 32.3
106% 37.1 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 42.7
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 21.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
40 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,275,775 RAM Kits tested

Typical KF556S40-16 2x16GB Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular KF556S40-16 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback