Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2023.

Average Bench: 86.5% (46th of 132)

Based on 25 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB
Poor: 55%Average: 86.5% Great: 106%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

The Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB averaged just 13.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 33.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB is 51.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 119ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.3GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 25 samples)
Rank 4686.5%
Min Avg Max
12.2 MC Read 34.6 42.5
17.9 MC Write 33.1 40.6
19 MC Mixed 30.9 38.2
93.9% 32.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.3 SC Read 14.3 20.2
5 SC Write 29.4 42
6.3 SC Mixed 18 26
58.8% 20.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
85.8 Latency 119 202
33.7% 119 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 37.3
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 36.6
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 24
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 29
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
66.6% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 11.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
54.5% Above average
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 19
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
25 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,281,758 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples917x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples47x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 79,827 samples5x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples662x
GeForce RTX 2050NvidiaBench 52%, 1,589 samples303x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples4x
SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples543x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples128x
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GBNvmeBench 346%, 998 samples111x
RAM
HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GBHynixBench 87%, 25 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 19 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback