Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 136% (17th of 132)

Based on 10 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB

Outstanding average bench

The Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB averaged 35.7% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 54.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 49.3GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB is 52.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 90.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 29.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 10 samples)
Min Avg Max
37.7 MC Read 54.5 63.9
35.8 MC Write 49.1 62.6
42 MC Mixed 49.3 57.2
146% 51 GB/s
Min Avg Max
17.4 SC Read 29.1 46
25.1 SC Write 47.4 53.6
24.4 SC Mixed 33.8 46.9
105% 36.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
82.1 Latency 90.3 112
44.3% 90.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 63.9
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 57.2
175% 61.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 28.2
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 63.1
MC Write 57.1
MC Mixed 57.2
169% 59.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 30.1
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 55.6
MC Mixed 56
164% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 28.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 61
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 52.1
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 46
SC Write 53.6
SC Mixed 46.9
140% 48.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 56.4
MC Write 49.6
MC Mixed 52
150% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 28.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 43.2
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 45.1
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 45.1
134% 47 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 48
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 45
SC Write 51.7
SC Mixed 45.6
136% 47.4 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,918,978 RAM Kits tested

Typical HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB Builds (Compare 811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Strix G614JI_G614JI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMCG78MEBSA092N HMCG78MEBSA095N 32GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback