Average Bench: 63.3% (86th of 113)

Based on 684 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GB

Above average average bench

The Hynix H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GB averaged 36.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 24.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 23.2GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GB is just 14.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 99.5ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 684 samples)
Min Avg Max
18.9 MC Read 22.7 24.8
21.4 MC Write 24.9 26.6
18.4 MC Mixed 21 22.6
65.3% 22.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.8 SC Read 13.1 16
15.6 SC Write 23.2 26.9
12.1 SC Mixed 18.2 21.3
51.9% 18.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
78.9 Latency 99.5 136
40.2% 99.5 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.2
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 19
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
684 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 30,854,291 RAM Kits tested.

Typical H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GB Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular H9CCNNNBLTBLAR-NUD 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback