Average Bench: 90.9% (37th of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Apacer APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB

Excellent average bench

The Apacer APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB averaged just 9.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Apacer APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 37.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 34.9GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Apacer APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB is 37.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Apacer APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 80.5ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
28.8 MC Read 34.2 42.6
29.1 MC Write 34.9 41.2
22.4 MC Mixed 29.1 37.6
93.5% 32.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12.9 SC Read 19.9 25.2
27.7 SC Write 37.7 42.2
20 SC Mixed 26.5 29.7
80% 28 GB/s
Min Avg Max
63.3 Latency 80.5 96
49.7% 80.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 37.6
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 29.7
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 35
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 26.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,485,809 RAM Kits tested

Typical APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB Builds (Compare 1,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $452

Popular APS-M48GU0N36J-4HC 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback