Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 89.4% (38th of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Ramaxel RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB
Poor: 72%Average: 89.4% Great: 98%

Very good average bench

The Ramaxel RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB averaged just 10.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Ramaxel RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 33.2GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Ramaxel RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB is 26.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Ramaxel RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 112ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.8GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.8 MC Read 32.9 36.6
33.2 MC Write 36.9 40.1
25.4 MC Mixed 30.5 35.1
95.5% 33.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.8 SC Read 15.8 20.3
23.2 SC Write 33.2 45
17.5 SC Mixed 21.8 29.3
67.5% 23.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70.8 Latency 112 145
35.6% 112 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 34
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 18.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 28.2
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 29.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 35.1
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 27.6
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 32.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 25.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,924,408 RAM Kits tested

Typical RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: Razer Tomahawk Gaming Desktop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $793

Popular RMSA3330MF88HCF-3200 2x31.5GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback