Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 87.5% (44th of 132)

Based on 16 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB

Very good average bench

The Crucial CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB averaged just 12.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 37.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 29.4GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB is 31.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 94.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 25.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 16 samples)
Min Avg Max
30.6 MC Read 37.6 84.7
13.9 MC Write 28.4 34.2
23.6 MC Mixed 29.4 32.9
90.9% 31.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
18.6 SC Read 25.3 35.3
10.9 SC Write 28.1 35.6
15.4 SC Mixed 25.1 30.8
74.8% 26.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
76.8 Latency 94.4 149
42.4% 94.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 84.7
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 31.6
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 30.8
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 27.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 35.3
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 26.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 29.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
16 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,916,251 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

System: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2+ D5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $397

Popular CT16G56C46U5.C8B2 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback