Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2023.

Average Bench: 65.6% (104th of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB
Poor: 51%Average: 65.6% Great: 75%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB averaged 34.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 24.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 24GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB is 24.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 107ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Rank 10465.6%
Min Avg Max
18.3 MC Read 24.5 29
12.1 MC Write 22.3 26.8
18.1 MC Mixed 24 26
67.4% 23.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.4 SC Read 17.9 20.7
10.9 SC Write 21.3 26.5
17.3 SC Mixed 20.8 25.8
57.1% 20 GB/s
Min Avg Max
88.4 Latency 107 134
37.3% 107 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
75.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
61.3% Good
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
57.1% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 25.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 25.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,950,719 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Colorful P15 23

CPU
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 90%, 18,684 samples11x
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples3x
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples1x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples10x
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples4x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples1x
SSD
PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G 512GBWDBench 214%, 71 samples8x
CN600 512GB PROColorfulBench 238%, 98 samples4x
KPART512GBC2DVT 512GBBench 186%, 282 samples3x
RAM
CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GBCrucialBench 66%, 6 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G56C46S5.M8B2 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Reaching its prime
Age: 12 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback