Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 145% (16th of 132)

Based on 247 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB averaged 44.6% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 56GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 55.2GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB is 67.5%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 100ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 30.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 247 samples)
Min Avg Max
41.8 MC Read 56 75.2
26.9 MC Write 55.2 68.5
41.9 MC Mixed 52.7 66.9
156% 54.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.4 SC Read 30.9 50.3
21.3 SC Write 48.4 71
21 SC Mixed 37 54.3
111% 38.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
81.1 Latency 100 143
39.9% 100 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 74.2
MC Write 68.3
MC Mixed 66.7
199% 69.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 29.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 51.4
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 47.9
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 52.4
142% 49.8 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 59.7
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 54
163% 57.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 30.5
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 51.2
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 26.7
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 50.3
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 38
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
247 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,278,415 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB Builds (Compare 488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 215%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 264%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Strix G814JZ_G814JZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback