Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 191% (3rd of 132)

Based on 22 user benchmarks.  Model: Adata AX5U6400C3216G-BLARWH 2x16GB
Poor: 155%Average: 191% Great: 216%

Outstanding average bench

The Adata AX5U6400C3216G-BLARWH 2x16GB averaged 90.8% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Adata AX5U6400C3216G-BLARWH 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 81GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 67.1GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Adata AX5U6400C3216G-BLARWH 2x16GB is 60.8%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Adata AX5U6400C3216G-BLARWH 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 69ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 51.8GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 22 samples)
Min Avg Max
50.1 MC Read 81 251
47.6 MC Write 62.7 79.9
50.8 MC Mixed 67.1 90.7
201% 70.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
41.3 SC Read 51.8 62.9
47.2 SC Write 65.8 79.9
42.2 SC Mixed 57.9 69.7
167% 58.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
35.9 Latency 69 97.5
58% 69 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 120
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 66.9
227% 79.5 GB/s
SC Read 44.9
SC Write 55.4
SC Mixed 50.8
144% 50.4 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 59.2
MC Write 74.9
MC Mixed 71.5
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 55.7
SC Write 75.9
SC Mixed 62.4
185% 64.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 108
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 59.2
204% 71.5 GB/s
SC Read 41.3
SC Write 47.2
SC Mixed 42.2
124% 43.6 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 68.5
180% 62.8 GB/s
SC Read 50.5
SC Write 71.7
SC Mixed 60.5
174% 60.9 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 68.2
MC Write 51.8
MC Mixed 59
170% 59.7 GB/s
SC Read 48.3
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 48.8
139% 48.6 GB/s
Latency 50.1
80% 50.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 68.5
MC Write 52.1
MC Mixed 58.3
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 47
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 48.1
140% 48.9 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 64.4
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 53.4
161% 56.5 GB/s
SC Read 47.3
SC Write 56.5
SC Mixed 50.4
147% 51.4 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 52.2
MC Mixed 50.8
148% 52 GB/s
SC Read 47
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 44.8
134% 47 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
22 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,280,551 RAM Kits tested

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback