Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2024.

Average Bench: 72.9% (92nd of 132)

Based on 15 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB
Poor: 50%Average: 72.9% Great: 89%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Crucial CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB averaged 27.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 27.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 26.6GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB is 38.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 116ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 15 samples)
Rank 9272.9%
Min Avg Max
14.2 MC Read 27.6 39.4
18.3 MC Write 26.6 33.2
18.5 MC Mixed 26.5 33.3
76.8% 26.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.8 SC Read 17.1 26
12.3 SC Write 23.1 33.9
10.7 SC Mixed 20.5 27.1
57.8% 20.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
79.9 Latency 116 175
34.4% 116 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 30.4
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
79.4% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 26.1
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
77% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 28.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 27.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
70% Very good
MC Read 23
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 22
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
66.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
63% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 18.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
15 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,951,702 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Geekom Mini Air12

CPU
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples13x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples13x
SSD
NVMe SSD 512GBWodpositBench 218%, 25 samples7x
NM620 512GBLexarBench 239%, 2,931 samples4x
NM6A1 512GBLexarBench 226%, 25 samples2x
RAM
CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GBCrucialBench 73%, 15 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Just released
Age: 8 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback