Average Bench: 167% (13th of 132)

Based on 81 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB averaged 67.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 64GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 60.2GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB is 61.2%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 50.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 81 samples)
Min Avg Max
49.5 MC Read 64 83.3
49.8 MC Write 58.3 69.3
50.1 MC Mixed 60.2 72.3
174% 60.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
37.9 SC Read 50.7 65.5
47.1 SC Write 58.5 67.2
39.8 SC Mixed 53.9 63
155% 54.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
48.7 Latency 72.2 103
55.4% 72.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 76.9
MC Write 63.8
MC Mixed 70.9
202% 70.5 GB/s
SC Read 61.7
SC Write 68.8
SC Mixed 60.6
182% 63.7 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 66.2
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 59.6
172% 60.1 GB/s
SC Read 43.5
SC Write 55.4
SC Mixed 50
142% 49.6 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 58
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 57.1
162% 56.6 GB/s
SC Read 50.8
SC Write 55.4
SC Mixed 50.4
149% 52.2 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 51.6
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.5
SC Write 59.5
SC Mixed 51.7
150% 52.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 24.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 21.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 336
12% 336 ns
81 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,415,745 RAM Kits tested

Typical CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB Builds (Compare 768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,005

Popular CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback