TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Unknown

CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2024.

Average Bench: 167% (1st of 115)

Based on 81 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB
Poor: 139%Average: 167% Great: 200%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB averaged 67.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 64GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 60.2GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB is 61.2%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Unknown CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 50.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 81 samples)
Rank 1167%
Min Avg Max
49.5 MC Read 64 83.3
49.8 MC Write 58.3 69.3
50.1 MC Mixed 60.2 72.3
174% 60.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
37.9 SC Read 50.7 65.5
47.1 SC Write 58.5 67.2
39.8 SC Mixed 53.9 63
155% 54.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
48.7 Latency 72.2 103
55.4% 72.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
172% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 62.9
177% 62 GB/s
SC Read 53.2
SC Write 67.6
SC Mixed 57.7
170% 59.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
164% Outstanding
MC Read 66.5
MC Write 54.7
MC Mixed 58.6
171% 59.9 GB/s
SC Read 47.8
SC Write 54.8
SC Mixed 50.8
146% 51.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
163% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 58.8
MC Mixed 58
168% 58.7 GB/s
SC Read 53.4
SC Write 61.7
SC Mixed 56.4
163% 57.2 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
163% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 64.2
MC Mixed 57.9
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 48.4
SC Write 69.4
SC Mixed 51.9
162% 56.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
161% Outstanding
MC Read 52.1
MC Write 65.9
MC Mixed 56.9
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 46.5
SC Write 63.3
SC Mixed 53
155% 54.3 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
154% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 53.8
158% 55.2 GB/s
SC Read 52.2
SC Write 58.2
SC Mixed 51.1
154% 53.8 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
150% Outstanding
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 55.5
MC Mixed 54.3
153% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 46.4
SC Write 59.1
SC Mixed 52.5
150% 52.7 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
144% Outstanding
MC Read 51.8
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 52.8
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 39.2
SC Write 47.8
SC Mixed 42.8
124% 43.3 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
142% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 52.2
156% 54.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 27.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
81 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,365,018 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB Builds (Compare 764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $320Bench 117%, 3,509 samples388x
Ryzen 5 7600XAMD  $197Bench 110%, 6,311 samples101x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $230Bench 112%, 5,382 samples94x
GPU
RTX 4070Nvidia  $549Bench 190%, 45,585 samples63x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $767Bench 240%, 46,082 samples61x
RX 7900-XTXAMD  $1,000Bench 257%, 7,128 samples56x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $160Bench 402%, 182,136 samples76x
990 Pro M.2 2TBSamsung  $150Bench 449%, 61,354 samples51x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples33x
RAM
CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GBUnknownBench 167%, 81 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,029

Popular CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Just released
Age: 3 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback