Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2017.

Average Bench: 40.2% (123rd of 132)

Based on 1,974 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB
Poor: 32%Average: 40.2% Great: 44%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB averaged 59.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 93.2ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 14.5GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB is just 12.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 12GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 1,974 samples)
Rank 12340.2%
Min Avg Max
11.5 MC Read 14.5 16
11.5 MC Write 14.4 15.7
9.9 MC Mixed 12 13.1
38.9% 13.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.91 SC Read 11.5 14.1
9.6 SC Write 14.2 16.7
7.61 SC Mixed 13 15.5
36.8% 12.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
72.4 Latency 93.2 137
42.9% 93.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
38% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
32.3% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 8.4
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
1,974 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,335,615 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples116x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples65x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples50x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples1x
SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial  $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples17x
CV1-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 86%, 2,348 samples13x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples10x
RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples27x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $140

Popular CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback