TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB

▲ 501 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2017.

Average Bench: 60.8% (87th of 113)

Based on 14,767 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB
Poor: 49%Average: 60.8% Great: 79%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Hynix H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB averaged 39.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 25GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 22.2GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB is 30.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 115ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14,767 samples)
Rank 8760.8%
Min Avg Max
16.1 MC Read 21.8 24.1
18.5 MC Write 25 47.1
16.3 MC Mixed 19.7 21.8
63.2% 22.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.5 SC Read 11.9 15.2
13.3 SC Write 22.2 26
9.5 SC Mixed 17.1 20.6
48.7% 17.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
80.9 Latency 115 162
34.8% 115 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
63.7% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
59% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
50.9% Above average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
41.9% Average
MC Read 12
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 384
10% 384 ns
14,767 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 47,855,179 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB Builds (Compare 6,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Book 2

CPU
Core i7-8650UIntelBench 61%, 38,125 samples5,623x
Core i5-7300UIntelBench 57%, 20,102 samples635x
Core i5-8350UIntelBench 64%, 16,079 samples308x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 327,501 samples4,311x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 168,864 samples951x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 25%, 129,490 samples672x
SSD
MZFLW256HEHP-000MV 256GBSamsungBench 101%, 6,339 samples1,631x
MZFLW512HMJP-000MV 512GBSamsungBench 113%, 5,453 samples1,513x
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GBBABench 97%, 1,985 samples1,075x
RAM
H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 61%, 14,767 samples1,697x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback