Average Bench: 70.9% (73rd of 108)

Based on 680 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMAA51S6AMR6N-UH 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Hynix HMAA51S6AMR6N-UH 2x8GB averaged 29.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 27.2GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMAA51S6AMR6N-UH 2x8GB is 21.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMAA51S6AMR6N-UH 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.2GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.8ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 680 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.2 MC Read 27.2 30.4
22.5 MC Write 27.6 30.4
18.4 MC Mixed 21.5 22.6
72.7% 25.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.23 SC Read 15.2 18.9
14 SC Write 26.1 32.2
12.2 SC Mixed 21.5 25.4
59.8% 20.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.8 Latency 87.8 120
45.6% 87.8 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 20.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
680 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,538,290 RAM Kits tested.

Typical HMAA51S6AMR6N-UH 2x8GB Builds (Compare 775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

System: HP Spectre x360 Convertible 13-ap0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $100

Popular HMAA51S6AMR6N-UH 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $228Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $332Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $640SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback