Average Bench: 90.7% (21st of 115)

Based on 20 user benchmarks.  Model: Toshiba-0098 KHX1600C10D3/8G 4x8GB
Poor: 57%Average: 90.7% Great: 99%

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

The Toshiba-0098 HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB averaged just 9.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Toshiba-0098 HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 36.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Toshiba-0098 HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB is 42.6%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Toshiba-0098 HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 11.8GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 12.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 20 samples)
Min Avg Max
19.8 MC Read 36.6 41.1
17.4 MC Write 36.8 40.4
20.3 MC Mixed 33.4 36.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
4.1 SC Read 15 17.1
4 SC Write 12.6 14.3
3.9 SC Mixed 11.8 13.4
37.6% 13.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.8 Latency 74.7 172
53.5% 74.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36.2
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 41
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 36.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 35.8
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 35.4
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 35.2
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 34.3
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 35.1
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
20 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,110,741 RAM Kits tested

Typical HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB Builds (Compare 2,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373

Popular HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback