Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 83.8% (59th of 132)

Based on 25 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-2666C15-16GVK 4x16GB

Very good average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB averaged just 16.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.4GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 30.3GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB is 40%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 77ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.2GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 25 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.5 MC Read 30.3 64.3
18 MC Write 32.4 58.6
19.9 MC Mixed 28 62.9
86.5% 30.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.8 SC Read 18.2 22
17.6 SC Write 29.7 39
10.4 SC Mixed 25 33.3
69.5% 24.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
57.8 Latency 77 108
52% 77 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 39.7
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 31
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 27
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
25 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,217,621 RAM Kits tested

Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING (MS-7984)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $427

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback