Average Bench: 80.4% (58th of 115)

Based on 29,586 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB

Very good average bench

The Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB averaged just 19.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 32GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 28.8GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB is 34.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 77.9ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 29,586 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.2 MC Read 32 38.2
19.4 MC Write 28.8 35.7
19.4 MC Mixed 25.6 34.5
82.4% 28.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.7 SC Read 18.6 26.8
17 SC Write 28.4 37
15.9 SC Mixed 24.5 32.2
68.1% 23.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.1 Latency 77.9 105
51.4% 77.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3067 MHz
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 27.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 24.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 24
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 23.8
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 20.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 27.7
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 29.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 28.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 28.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 28
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
29,586 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,003,456 RAM Kits tested

Typical M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB Builds (Compare 1,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $232

Popular M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback