Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Kingston

HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB

▲ 502 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2017.

Average Bench: 69.8% (98th of 132)

Based on 2,916 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB
Poor: 41%Average: 69.8% Great: 81%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB averaged 30.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 26.8GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB is 39.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.7ns

Average Bench

(Based on 2,916 samples)
Rank 9869.8%
Min Avg Max
14.9 MC Read 26.8 30.9
15.1 MC Write 27.3 32.5
15.5 MC Mixed 21.4 23.9
71.9% 25.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.1 SC Read 14.1 17.7
8.14 SC Write 25.4 33.1
8.3 SC Mixed 19.9 25.2
56.6% 19.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.4 Latency 87.7 165
45.6% 87.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
73.8% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
68.2% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
66.6% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
62.9% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
62.5% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
62% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
2,916 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,304,817 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB Builds (Compare 3,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,478x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples1,005x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample1x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples1,412x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples823x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples808x
SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples310x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples284x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples165x
RAM
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples198x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,036

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

6 years ago.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback