Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Unknown

64x4GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2017.

Average Bench: 45.6% (119th of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown 64x4GB
Poor: 22%Average: 45.6% Great: 60%

Below average average bench

The Unknown 64x4GB averaged 54.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 26.3GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.4ns

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown 64x4GB is 38.6%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown 64x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 3.47GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 3.88GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Rank 11945.6%
Min Avg Max
11 MC Read 26.3 39.3
5.2 MC Write 10.5 15.2
6.9 MC Mixed 14.6 21
49% 17.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
4.4 SC Read 5.17 5.8
3 SC Write 3.47 3.7
2.8 SC Mixed 3.88 4.4
11.9% 4.17 GB/s
Min Avg Max
39.1 Latency 72.4 123
55.3% 72.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
64 of 64 slots used
256GB FB-DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
60.1% Good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 39.1
102% 39.1 ns
64 of 64 slots used
256GB FB-DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
54% Above average
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 14.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
64 of 64 slots used
256GB FB-DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
52.6% Above average
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 21
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
64 of 64 slots used
256GB FB-DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
52.6% Above average
MC Read 36
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 13.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
64 of 64 slots used
256GB FB-DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
32.6% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.8
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 42.1
95% 42.1 ns
64 of 64 slots used
256GB FB-DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
21.5% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,185,825 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback