Average Bench: 81.6% (52nd of 115)

Based on 1,409 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GSXWB 2x8GB

Very good average bench

The G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB averaged just 18.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 32.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 28.1GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB is 42.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 79.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 20.4GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,409 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.7 MC Read 32.5 41.2
17.8 MC Write 28.1 39.3
19.2 MC Mixed 27.4 34.2
83.8% 29.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12.4 SC Read 20.4 26.5
14.6 SC Write 27.3 40.4
14 SC Mixed 24.9 33.8
69.2% 24.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
55.5 Latency 79.4 105
50.4% 79.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 28.4
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 28.3
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 24.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 26.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 33
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 30.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 26.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 21.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
1,409 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,358,631 RAM Kits tested

Typical F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 6,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $350

Popular F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback