Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 61.5% (105th of 132)

Based on 430 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB

Above average average bench

The Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB averaged 38.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 23GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 22.9GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB is 43.8%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.8GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 16.8GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 430 samples)
Min Avg Max
17 MC Read 23 34.5
17 MC Write 22.9 39
15.3 MC Mixed 19.7 34.2
62.5% 21.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.7 SC Read 15.8 18.2
11.6 SC Write 16.8 20.3
12.1 SC Mixed 17 19.9
47.3% 16.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.5 Latency 70 81.3
57.1% 70 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 33.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1632 MHz
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 14.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
430 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,072,501 RAM Kits tested

Typical M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB Builds (Compare 2,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297

Popular M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback