Average Bench: 47.8% (118th of 132)

Based on 618 user benchmarks.  Model: Unifosa GU512303EP0202 4x2GB

Below average average bench

The Unifosa GU512303EP0202 4x2GB averaged 52.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 70.1ns
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 16.9GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unifosa GU512303EP0202 4x2GB is 20.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unifosa GU512303EP0202 4x2GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.3GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 14.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 618 samples)
Min Avg Max
10 MC Read 16.5 17.9
8.9 MC Write 16.9 19
13.3 MC Mixed 15.3 16.4
46.4% 16.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.91 SC Read 13.3 14.9
6.6 SC Write 14.7 17.6
8 SC Mixed 15.1 17.6
41.1% 14.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.7 Latency 70.1 105
57% 70.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
618 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,539,495 RAM Kits tested

Typical GU512303EP0202 4x2GB Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway DX4860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $193

Popular GU512303EP0202 4x2GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback