TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

G.SKILL F4-3200C16D-32GTZR

F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB

▲ 501 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2018.

Average Bench: 90.3% (20th of 113)

Based on 25,176 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GB
Poor: 68%Average: 90.3% Great: 111%

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB averaged just 9.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 36.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 30.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB is 42.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.1ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 22.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 25,176 samples)
Rank 2090.3%
Min Avg Max
26 MC Read 36.2 45.5
18.1 MC Write 30.6 41.4
21.9 MC Mixed 30.4 39.5
92.5% 32.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14.9 SC Read 22.3 31.1
16.6 SC Write 29.8 45.7
21 SC Mixed 29.8 39
78% 27.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
54.3 Latency 72.1 105
55.5% 72.1 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
142% Outstanding
MC Read 82.4
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 37.3
154% 54.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 38.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 31.7
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 45.1
SC Mixed 30.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 31.3
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 30.3
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.7
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
73.8% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
73.2% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 24.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
25,176 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 41,491,313 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB Builds (Compare 57,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $305Bench 87%, 532,317 samples17,843x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $234Bench 84%, 753,232 samples9,505x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD  $485Bench 88%, 219,023 samples8,160x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 118%, 432,191 samples8,108x
RX 5700-XTAMD  $400Bench 105%, 313,119 samples7,062x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 153%, 163,391 samples3,274x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $167Bench 323%, 229,960 samples3,306x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 303%, 244,236 samples3,217x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 284%, 282,296 samples2,936x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 90%, 25,176 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,175

Popular F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
7,740

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

7 months ago.

Runs fine at 2133 out of the box, runs with near immediate errors in memtest after enabling XMP at 3200MHz. From what I've been reading online, I'm certainly not the only person with this issue. Don't be fooled by the fact that this is technically Samsung B-die; it performs terribly at overclocking.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 2 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback