Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Kingston

9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q1 2016.

Average Bench: 40.2% (124th of 132)

Based on 95 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston 9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB
Poor: 35%Average: 40.2% Great: 43%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Kingston 9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB averaged 59.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 76.3ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 14.2GB/s

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston 9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB is just 8.54%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Kingston 9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 12GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 95 samples)
Rank 12440.2%
Min Avg Max
12.1 MC Read 14.2 15.2
11 MC Write 14.1 15.2
10.5 MC Mixed 12 13.1
38.4% 13.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.2 SC Read 11.1 13.2
9.48 SC Write 13.3 15.2
8.96 SC Mixed 12.5 14.4
35.1% 12.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
63 Latency 76.3 107
52.4% 76.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
95 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,235,713 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB Builds (Compare 14,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel  $127Bench 81%, 588,978 samples6,993x
Core i5-6600KIntel  $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples3,869x
Core i7-6700Intel  $150Bench 72%, 282,363 samples1,103x
GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia  $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples2,306x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples1,451x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,316x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples936x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples819x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples335x
RAM
9905598-009.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 95 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $722

Popular 9905598-009.A00G 1x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback