TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Red

Hat 1x5GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2018.

Average Bench: 50.2% (98th of 115)

Based on 20 user benchmarks.  Model: Red Hat 1x5GB
Poor: 25%Average: 50.2% Great: 81%

Average average bench

The Red Hat 1x5GB averaged 49.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 19.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 18.9GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Red Hat 1x5GB is 55.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Red Hat 1x5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 7.94GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 154ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 20 samples)
Rank 9850.2%
Min Avg Max
5.8 MC Read 18.9 62.8
8.7 MC Write 19.6 39.7
6.1 MC Mixed 18.9 75
54.7% 19.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
0.2 SC Read 7.94 16.6
2.1 SC Write 11.1 30.5
0.4 SC Mixed 10.4 28.7
28% 9.81 GB/s
Min Avg Max
36.7 Latency 154 324
26% 154 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
78.4% Very good
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 32.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
53% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 16.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 12.1
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
47.3% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
35.3% Below average
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
29.3% Poor
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.1
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 257
16% 257 ns
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.7
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
20% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 324
12% 324 ns
20 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,282,895 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback