Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 76.1% (84th of 132)

Based on 2,095 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB averaged 23.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 29.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 29.4GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB is 31.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 80.1ns

Average Bench

(Based on 2,095 samples)
Min Avg Max
19.9 MC Read 29.4 33.3
19.5 MC Write 29.6 33.7
18.5 MC Mixed 22.7 27
77.8% 27.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.76 SC Read 16.1 19.9
15.1 SC Write 29.3 36.4
12.9 SC Mixed 22.2 26.5
64.4% 22.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.6 Latency 80.1 127
50% 80.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 17.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
2,095 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,339,559 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB Builds (Compare 3,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $47

Popular CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback