Average Bench: 78.6% (77th of 132)

Based on 5,545 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB

Good average bench

The Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB averaged 21.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 32.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 30.6GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB is 27.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 85.2ns

Average Bench

(Based on 5,545 samples)
Min Avg Max
21 MC Read 29.2 32.4
19.6 MC Write 30.6 33.5
19.5 MC Mixed 24.8 28
80.6% 28.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.8 SC Read 15.9 19.2
19.2 SC Write 32.2 37.2
15.2 SC Mixed 23.3 27.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67 Latency 85.2 123
47% 85.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 26.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25.8
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 24.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 22.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 23
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 13.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
5,545 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,510,723 RAM Kits tested

Typical M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 4,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 71%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 7590


Popular M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback