Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung

M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q1 2016.

Average Bench: 37.5% (128th of 132)

Based on 8,819 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
Poor: 29%Average: 37.5% Great: 41%

Popular builds with this RAM

Poor average bench

The Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB averaged 62.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 95.7ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 13.5GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB is just 12.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 10.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 11.3GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 8,819 samples)
Rank 12837.5%
Min Avg Max
10.3 MC Read 13.5 14.8
10.3 MC Write 13.3 14.6
9.1 MC Mixed 11.3 12.7
36.2% 12.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.66 SC Read 10.7 13.2
7.47 SC Write 12.7 15.4
6.26 SC Mixed 11.8 14.3
33.4% 11.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
71.6 Latency 95.7 150
41.8% 95.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
35.5% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
33.7% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 3.8
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 330
12% 330 ns
8,819 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,072,450 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples422x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples32x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples451x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $281Bench 100%, 447,556 samples1x
SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples94x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples44x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples20x
RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples148x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback