TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2018.

Average Bench: 74.4% (88th of 132)

Based on 25 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB
Poor: 61%Average: 74.4% Great: 85%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB averaged 25.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 28.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 28.1GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB is 24.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.6GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 73ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 25 samples)
Rank 8874.4%
Min Avg Max
15.2 MC Read 28.1 34.2
14.1 MC Write 28.3 33.1
14.1 MC Mixed 22.9 29.2
75.5% 26.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.3 SC Read 17.6 23.9
11.8 SC Write 26.8 33.1
12.8 SC Mixed 22.4 25.9
63.6% 22.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.2 Latency 73 98.2
54.8% 73 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
78.4% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 26.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 20.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
61.1% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 19.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
25 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,415,457 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB Builds (Compare 3,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel  $112Bench 94%, 46,609 samples563x
Core i5-11400Intel  $119Bench 94%, 24,459 samples333x
Core i7-11700KIntel  $225Bench 101%, 65,651 samples306x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $226Bench 100%, 447,556 samples457x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples297x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples174x
SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 224%, 92,081 samples85x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples83x
RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GBCrucialBench 74%, 25 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $408

Popular CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback