Average Bench: 164% (14th of 132)

Based on 11 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3600C16-8GTZSW 8x8GB
Poor: 128%Average: 164% Great: 203%

Outstanding average bench

The G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB averaged 64.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 73.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 62.6GB/s

Very poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB is 75.3%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.3GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 81.3ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 11 samples)
Min Avg Max
47.8 MC Read 62.6 85.9
52.6 MC Write 73.9 87.1
45.6 MC Mixed 62.3 85.5
189% 66.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8 SC Read 15.3 25.6
19.3 SC Write 31.3 45.3
11.4 SC Mixed 22.5 43
65.9% 23.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.9 Latency 81.3 118
49.2% 81.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 85.9
MC Write 79.7
MC Mixed 85.5
239% 83.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 43
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 80.6
MC Write 83.9
MC Mixed 80.5
233% 81.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 33.3
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
MC Read 58.9
MC Write 87.1
MC Mixed 59.4
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 14.3
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 72.3
MC Mixed 50.8
166% 58.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 74
MC Mixed 45.6
159% 55.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 14.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 64.8
MC Mixed 51.9
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
11 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,443,531 RAM Kits tested

Typical F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB Builds (Compare 842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $992

Popular F4 DDR4 3600 C16 8x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback