TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung

M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2018.

Average Bench: 31.4% (112th of 115)

Based on 23 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB
Poor: 26%Average: 31.4% Great: 36%

Popular builds with this RAM

Poor average bench

The Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB averaged 68.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 90.7ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 12.4GB/s

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB is just 9.44%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 7.81GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 8.87GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 23 samples)
Rank 11231.4%
Min Avg Max
8.4 MC Read 12.4 29
7.5 MC Write 9.19 15.1
7.7 MC Mixed 9.91 16.7
29.9% 10.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
3.7 SC Read 9.82 11.8
3 SC Write 8.87 12.1
3.8 SC Mixed 7.81 10
25.2% 8.83 GB/s
Min Avg Max
69.7 Latency 90.7 202
44.1% 90.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
50.8% Above average
MC Read 29
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.3
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
33.4% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
30.3% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
30% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 8.2
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
23 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,364,910 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples273x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples146x
GPU
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples115x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples111x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples67x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples36x
RAM
M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GBSamsungBench 31%, 23 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158

Popular M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback