Average Bench: 96.3% (11th of 113)

Based on 9,011 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB

Excellent average bench

The Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB averaged just 3.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 39GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 34.6GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB is 53.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 74ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.8GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 9,011 samples)
Min Avg Max
28.4 MC Read 39 52.3
18 MC Write 30.6 42.9
24.1 MC Mixed 34.6 45
99.2% 34.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.9 SC Read 24.8 32.1
17.5 SC Write 29 45.8
23.7 SC Mixed 33.4 43.2
83.1% 29.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
55.2 Latency 74 95.9
54% 74 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 36.8
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 38
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 29.4
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 28.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.3
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38.6
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 38.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 36.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 33.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 30
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
9,011 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 45,841,374 RAM Kits tested.

Typical BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB Builds (Compare 81,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $859

Popular BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

113 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback