Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung

M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB

▲ 503 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2019.

Average Bench: 41.4% (123rd of 132)

Based on 5,740 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB
Poor: 33%Average: 41.4% Great: 46%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB averaged 58.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.2ns
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 16.1GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB is just 13.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 11.1GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 5,740 samples)
Rank 12341.4%
Min Avg Max
12.4 MC Read 16.1 17.7
10.7 MC Write 14.3 15.9
9.16 MC Mixed 11.1 11.9
39.5% 13.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.7 SC Read 11.9 14.8
7.87 SC Write 14.2 18.2
6.97 SC Mixed 12.4 15
36.6% 12.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.5 Latency 78.2 115
51.2% 78.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
41% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
36% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
33.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
32.6% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
32.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
5,740 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,215,685 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples373x
GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples199x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples174x
SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel  $66Bench 156%, 162,275 samples259x
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples10x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $55Bench 191%, 163,917 samples6x
RAM
M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 5,740 samples174x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66

Popular M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,032

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

4 years ago.

Super low memory throughput negatively affects fps.

TUR-User
Avatar level
5,614

Poor

4 years ago.

its really bad ram its effects your fps too

CHN-User
Avatar level
2,114

Average

2 years ago.

But actually it can be better if u tune it

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback