Average Bench: 85.1% (47th of 132)

Based on 54,117 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB

Very good average bench

The Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB averaged just 14.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 29.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB is 53%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 22.2GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 54,117 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.8 MC Read 34.2 47.9
16.1 MC Write 28.4 40.7
18.6 MC Mixed 29.1 38.4
87.3% 30.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
13.5 SC Read 22.2 30.5
15.6 SC Write 27.7 43.2
15.8 SC Mixed 27.3 38.4
73.5% 25.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
56 Latency 78.3 107
51.1% 78.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 35.7
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 27.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 32.7
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.5
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 27.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 21.9
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 29
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 27.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 19.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 25
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 23.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 19.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
54,117 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,524,598 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB Builds (Compare 26,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $844

Popular CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback