Average Bench: 86.7% (46th of 132)

Based on 1,038 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB

Very good average bench

The Unknown DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB averaged just 13.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 30.6GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB is 51%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 84.9ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 22.4GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,038 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.2 MC Read 34.8 45.1
19.4 MC Write 28.5 41.8
21.4 MC Mixed 30.6 36.5
89.5% 31.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14 SC Read 22.4 28.3
17.8 SC Write 28 41.8
17.1 SC Mixed 28 36.1
74.7% 26.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
61.7 Latency 84.9 111
47.1% 84.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 36
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 27.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 24.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 28.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 28.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 27.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 19.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
1,038 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,593,842 RAM Kits tested

Typical DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB Builds (Compare 8,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $432

Popular DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback