Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

G.SKILL F4-3200C16Q-64GTZN

F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2019.

Average Bench: 103% (23rd of 132)

Based on 778 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZN 4x16GB
Poor: 66%Average: 103% Great: 157%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB averaged 3.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 46.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 35.5GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB is 91.4%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 79.7ns
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 23.6GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 778 samples)
Rank 23103%
Min Avg Max
25.6 MC Read 46.7 91.5
17.8 MC Write 32.8 41.2
23.6 MC Mixed 35.5 43.1
109% 38.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.6 SC Read 25.3 31.5
15.9 SC Write 23.6 43.6
22.6 SC Mixed 33.7 41.5
78.6% 27.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.2 Latency 79.7 109
50.2% 79.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
149% Outstanding
MC Read 90
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 41.4
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 40.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
130% Outstanding
MC Read 97.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 29.5
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 28
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
109% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 37.1
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.1
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 31.6
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 29.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
778 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,339,993 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD  $305Bench 88%, 197,342 samples46x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $136Bench 86%, 635,419 samples43x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD  $215Bench 99%, 60,132 samples36x
GPU
RX 5700-XTAMD  $266Bench 98%, 254,908 samples18x
RTX 3090Nvidia  $1,350Bench 210%, 158,856 samples18x
RX 6900-XTAMD  $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples18x
SSD
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent  $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples14x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $117Bench 385%, 327,441 samples12x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 297%, 331,647 samples11x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 103%, 778 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $671

Popular F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback