Average Bench: 51% (88th of 108)

Based on 1,315 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix H9CCNNNBLTMLAR-NTM 2x4GB
Poor: 39%Average: 51% Great: 56%

Average average bench

The Hynix H9CCNNNBLTMLAR-NTM 2x4GB averaged 48.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 20.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 17GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix H9CCNNNBLTMLAR-NTM 2x4GB is just 17.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix H9CCNNNBLTMLAR-NTM 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 12.2GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 13.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,315 samples)
Min Avg Max
12.6 MC Read 17 18.9
15.2 MC Write 20.8 23
13.4 MC Mixed 16.8 18.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.7 SC Read 12.2 15.5
6.3 SC Write 13.7 18.2
7.6 SC Mixed 14.9 18.1
38.9% 13.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70.3 Latency 91.6 139
43.7% 91.6 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 6.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 14
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 13.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 4
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
1,315 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,443,731 RAM Kits tested.

Typical H9CCNNNBLTMLAR-NTM 2x4GB Builds (Compare 4,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular H9CCNNNBLTMLAR-NTM 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback