Average Bench: 58.3% (83rd of 108)

Based on 3,523 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB

Average average bench

The Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB averaged 41.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 23.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 21GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB is 26.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 114ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,523 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.7 MC Read 20.5 24.2
17.5 MC Write 23.9 41.7
15.3 MC Mixed 19 20.9
60.4% 21.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.85 SC Read 11.9 15.6
11.4 SC Write 21 25.5
8.6 SC Mixed 16.6 20.3
47.1% 16.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
86 Latency 114 156
35.1% 114 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 24
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 19.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
3,523 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 20,313,706 RAM Kits tested.

Typical H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB Builds (Compare 2,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 13 9350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback