Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 106% (22nd of 132)

Based on 421 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX3466C16D4/16GX 4x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB averaged 5.8% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 41GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 39.8GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB is 68.9%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 70.9ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 421 samples)
Min Avg Max
27.1 MC Read 41 72.7
26 MC Write 39.8 64.3
23.6 MC Mixed 35.9 60.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.9 SC Read 21.9 31.3
17.9 SC Write 33.4 49.8
15 SC Mixed 31 41.1
82.2% 28.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
51.8 Latency 70.9 98.4
56.4% 70.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 38.6
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 36.1
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 37.9
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 35.3
107% 37.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 36.4
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 34.4
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 34.1
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 28.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 34.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 37.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 34.9
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 35.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
421 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,307,227 RAM Kits tested

Typical HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB Builds (Compare 978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370M GAMING PRO AC (MS-7B44)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $481

Popular HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback