Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

G.SKILL F3-12800CL7Q-16GBXM

RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 57% (107th of 132)

Based on 838 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F3-12800CL7-4GBXM 4x4GB
Poor: 42%Average: 57% Great: 85%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB averaged 42.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 66.1ns
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 20.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB is 42.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.8GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 17.5GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 838 samples)
Rank 10757%
Min Avg Max
15.1 MC Read 20.2 31.4
14.2 MC Write 20.6 33.3
14.4 MC Mixed 18.3 26.9
56.3% 19.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.35 SC Read 14.8 21.1
8.3 SC Write 17.9 24.3
10.6 SC Mixed 17.5 26
47.8% 16.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
49 Latency 66.1 86.3
60.5% 66.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
62.2% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
61.8% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
59% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
58.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
838 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,306,244 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB Builds (Compare 7,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples3,595x
Core i5-4690KIntel  $43Bench 70%, 229,359 samples1,743x
Core i7-4790Intel  $104Bench 71%, 255,027 samples482x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples1,327x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples593x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples423x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples431x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples314x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples215x
RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 838 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648

Popular RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback