Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Unknown

0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Average Bench: 62.4% (105th of 132)

Based on 190 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB
Poor: 55%Average: 62.4% Great: 67%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB averaged 37.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 23.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 23.3GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB is just 12.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.1GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 18.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 190 samples)
Rank 10562.4%
Min Avg Max
20.3 MC Read 23.3 24.9
19.1 MC Write 23.3 25.6
17.9 MC Mixed 19.4 20.4
62.9% 22 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.9 SC Read 14.1 16.3
16 SC Write 21.3 25
14.2 SC Mixed 18.1 20.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
63.8 Latency 71.4 83.2
56% 71.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
65.6% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.3
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
62.3% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
61.5% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
60.4% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
46.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 8.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
190 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,330,868 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel  $90Bench 64%, 241,476 samples52x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $127Bench 81%, 588,978 samples27x
Core i5-6600Intel  $246Bench 68%, 80,688 samples10x
GPU
Radeon R9 M380AMDBench 18%, 336 samples35x
RADEON R9 M390AMDBench 22%, 314 samples22x
RADEON R9 M395AMDBench 28%, 228 samples16x
SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial  $79Bench 106%, 202,785 samples4x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples4x
SM1024G PCIe 1TBAppleBench 169%, 404 samples3x
RAM
0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GBUnknownBench 62%, 190 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $169

Popular 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 2x4GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback