Average Bench: 92.4% (32nd of 132)

Based on 13,978 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3600C18-16GVK 2x16GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB averaged just 7.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 38.3GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 32.7GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB is 51.8%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 71.9ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 25.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 13,978 samples)
Min Avg Max
26.6 MC Read 38.3 55.4
19.5 MC Write 28.1 44
22.3 MC Mixed 32.6 41.2
94.3% 33 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.1 SC Read 25.9 32.8
18.3 SC Write 27.7 46.9
20.3 SC Mixed 32.7 41.5
82.1% 28.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
51.4 Latency 71.9 97.7
55.7% 71.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 85.5
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 32.3
145% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 30
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 61.9
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 38.6
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.6
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 29.2
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 39.4
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 31
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 26.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 30.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 34.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 39.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 34.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 35.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 24.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
13,978 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,594,054 RAM Kits tested

Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB Builds (Compare 26,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $863

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback