Average Bench: 93.3% (15th of 115)

Based on 849 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB

Excellent average bench

The Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB averaged just 6.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 39.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.5GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB is 68.4%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.1ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 22.6GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 849 samples)
Min Avg Max
22.9 MC Read 39.2 76.1
20.3 MC Write 32.5 45.8
21.4 MC Mixed 31.2 40.2
98% 34.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14.2 SC Read 22.6 30.2
15.7 SC Write 27 44.6
18.5 SC Mixed 29.1 39.1
74.9% 26.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
63.7 Latency 87.1 119
45.9% 87.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 48.6
146% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 34.9
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 33.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 38.5
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 36.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 29.7
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 30
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 33
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 29.2
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.4
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.2
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 32
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 31.3
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 28.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
849 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,156,979 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB Builds (Compare 9,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,545

Popular CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback